Notice ID
ba16929a215d12b4ebaf2bc3a82da4d7
The General Services Administration GSA announces an opportunity for Design Excellence in public architecture for performance of ArchitecturalEngineering Design for a new US Port of Entry in Raymond Montana in accordance with General Services Administration GSA quality standards and requirements This is stage II of a two stage selection process The following firms have been selected short listed for Stage II consideration 1 Carlson Architects PS Architecture Planning 2111 3rd Avenue Seattle WA 98121 Donald Carlson 2 Hammond Beeby Rupert Ainge Inc 440 N Wells Suite 630 Chicago IL 60610 Mary Brigid OToole 3 Johnson Laffen Galloway Architects 124 N 3rd Street Grand Forks ND 58201 Lonnie J Laffen 4 Overland Partners 5101 Broadway San Antonio TX 78209 Mark Headley 5 Valerio Dewalt Train Associates 500 N Dearborn Street 9th Floor Chicago IL 60610 Joseph M Valerio Stage II In this stage the entire project TEAM including the AE Design Firms selected above in the first stage their designated Lead Designers and ALL the Consultants who will work on the project will be evaluated Your firm is hereby requested to submit by January 17 2002 300 pm local time four copies of the SF 254 and 255s that reflect the entire design team and all outside consultants to include as a minimum the following MechanicalPlumbing Consultant Electrical Consultant Structural Consultant CivilSurveying Consultant Landscaping Consultant Environmental Consultant Fire Protection Consultant and Cost Estimating Consultant The SF254s255 shall include a maximum of five previous similar projects and information demonstrating the overall design capabilities of each subconsultant If any of these services are to be provided by a previously submitted consultant provide the above information for that consultant The Stage II evaluation factors are as follows 1 Team Past Design Performance and Experience 50 Describe no more than two past architectural and engineering challenges of similar size and complexity and your design response In your narrative maximum of three pages per project discuss your experience with the following issues and how they would be addressed on this project A Explain how you would ensure that the project budget of a specific amount between 5 and 75M is met B Explain how you would ensure that the design schedule of 9 months is met C Discuss your methodology on using locally available materials construction in remote locations D Where would this project fit into your office workload E How does your firm meet functional requirements and provide design excellence 2 Team Organization and Management Plan 30 Provide a detailed organization chart for the entire design team along with written narratives addressing the following issues Knowledge of Leadership Energy and Environmental Design LEED energy principles and sustainable design Availability for meetings with GSA clients and community representatives Accurate cost estimating Design issue tracking Logging in and response to agency comments Identify key roles lines of communication and means to integrate client and community input explain quality control plan the physical location of major design work the coordination plan for consultant work and the work to be produced in remote offices 3 Professional Qualifications 15 Provide key personnel resumes SF254s and SF 255s In block 8 of the SF 254 specify only current personnel currently on the company payroll for each firm 4 Geographic Location 5 Demonstrate how the design team proposes to meet the requirement to produce at least 35 of the level of contract effort within the State of Montana or North Dakota Project description is as follows The building is approximately 30033 gross square feet including 50 parking spaces at a proposed site lo
-
Department/Ind.Agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
-
Subtier
PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE
-
Office
PBS R8 ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION